After months of negotiations, a new tax and spending bill was approved by Congress and signed into law by President Trump on July 4. This new budget is far-reaching, including making many parts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanent, raising state and local tax exemptions, extending the estate tax limits, and much more. It attempts to offset some of these provisions with spending cuts in key areas such as Medicaid.
This bill matters because, while trade policy has been at the forefront over the past several months, tax and spending policy in Washington has been a growing source of uncertainty for many years. While there is political disagreement with the direction of this new budget, it does take the possibility of a “tax cliff” off the table - a situation where tax policy could have changed dramatically if provisions expired at the end of this year.
On an individual level, taxes directly affect many aspects of financial planning, and the specific provisions in this tax bill have immediate implications for household finances. From an economic perspective, many investors also worry about the level of government spending, the growing national debt, and other factors that have weighed on markets over the past two decades.
Thus, there are many angles from which to view the recently passed budget. What do investors need to know when it comes to their own financial plans and what it means for markets in the years to come?
The new tax bill, dubbed the “One Big Beautiful Bill” by the administration, extends and expands several key aspects from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) that were set to expire. It also introduces new measures that provide other benefits to taxpayers, which are only partially offset by spending cuts in other areas.
Here are just some of the major provisions that may affect households:
In addition, here are the related savings opportunities and benefit-related changes.
These and many other changes maintain the relatively low tax environment that has characterized the past several decades. As the accompanying chart shows, current tax rates remain well below the peaks experienced during much of the 20th century, when top marginal rates exceeded 70% and sometimes reached above 90% during wartime periods.
It's no surprise then that government borrowing has increased persistently over the past century and will likely continue to do so. The Congressional Budget Office, a non-partisan agency that supports Congress, estimates that this new tax and spending bill will add $3.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. This is against the backdrop of a federal debt that already exceeds 120% of GDP, or $36.2 trillion, which amounts to about $106,000 per American.
Unfortunately, there are no easy solutions to this challenge, especially because this is a contentious political topic. On the one hand, tax cuts can stimulate economic growth, which may
help to offset revenue losses through increased economic activity. On the other hand, Washington
has a poor track record of balancing budgets even when the economy is strong. The last balanced
budgets occurred 25 years ago during the Clinton years, and 56 years before that during the
Johnson administration.
It’s also important to remember that there has not always been an income tax in the United States.
The modern income tax system began with the 16th Amendment in 1913 which applied modest
rates to relatively few Americans. The system expanded dramatically during the Great Depression
and World War II, with top rates reaching 94% by 1944. The post-war period brought various
reforms, including President Reagan’s Tax Reform Act of 1986 that simplified the tax code and
lowered rates.
The situation has changed significantly in the intervening years. As the accompanying chart above
shows, individual income taxes now represent the primary source of federal revenue. Social
insurance taxes, also known as payroll taxes, are withheld from wages and help to pay for Social
Security, Medicare, unemployment insurance, and other programs. Other sources of revenue are
much smaller in proportion and include corporate taxes, which were reduced by the TCJA, and
excise taxes, such as tariffs.
For investors, tax policies can certainly have direct implications on financial plans and portfolios.
From a macroeconomic perspective, however, fiscal implications have more limited effects. Over
longer periods, higher debt levels can influence interest rates and inflation expectations. While
these factors have been relatively high in recent years, many of the worst-case scenarios have not
yet occurred. The key for long-term investors is to maintain diversified portfolios that can perform
across different fiscal and economic environments, rather than reacting to policy changes alone.
The bottom line? The new spending and tax bill extends and expands the current low-tax environment. For investors, a properly constructed financial plan is designed with these tax provisions in mind. When it comes to growing deficits and the national debt, it’s important to not react with our portfolios, but to maintain a longer-term perspective.
Download the PDF to share or reference later.
Have questions about how these insights and ideas could impact your personalized wealth management strategy? Let’s talk.
This communication is for information and educational purposes only.This is not a recommendation for the sale or investment in any product or strategy or to be perceived as individual advice. Information presented has been prepared from sources believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed and does not represent all available data necessary for making investment or tax decisions. Economic and market forecasts presented herein reflect a series of assumptions and judgments as of the date of this presentation and are subject to change without notice. Forecasts do not consider the specific investment objectives, restrictions, tax and financial situation or other needs of an individual. Actual data will vary and may not be reflected here. Accordingly, these forecasts should be viewed as merely representative of a broad range of possible outcomes. The opinion expressed by this individual is based on facts and circumstances known at this time, is subject to change and does not reflect the opinions of all financial professionals of XML. Financial professionals do not provide specific tax/legal advice and the information presented at this should not be considered as such. You should always consult your tax/legal advisor regarding your own specific tax/legal situation.